Sinclair Davidson
This page was last edited on at
Sinclair Davidson is Professor Institutional Economics at the School of Economics, Finance and Marketing at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) University in Australia.1
Relationship with the Tobacco Industry
Davidson is Adjunct Fellow (previously Senior Research Fellow) at the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA), an Australian think tank which has received funding from British American Tobacco (BAT).2345
In 2012, The Sydney Morning Herald accused IPA of lacking transparency in the debate around plain packaging, by presenting itself as an independent entity while simultaneously being funded by BAT.6
- For more information visit our Institute of Public Affairs page.
Davidson declared in 2016, in a post on the Australian libertarian blog Catallaxy Files, that he did not receive money from either the tobacco industry or from the IPA.7 He added that he does not know whether the IPA receives funding from the tobacco industry. “I am not in the pay of big tobacco; I am an academic economist who tests and critiques government policy.”8
In 2016 and 2017, Davidson was a speaker at the tobacco-industry funded event, the Global Tobacco & Nicotine Forum.910 and was listed as a speaker in 2018 See also:
- Global Tobacco and Nicotine Forum 2018
- Global Tobacco and Nicotine Forum 2017
- Global Tobacco and Nicotine Forum 2016
Against Plain Packaging
Davidson has voiced strong opinions against the tobacco plain packaging policy, which was introduced in December 2012 in Australia, claiming there was no proof that it is effective and that it undermined intellectual property rights.111213
Davidson was quoted in the Canadian media saying that Canada’s proposals to introduce plain packaging wouldn’t work if Canada’s experience turned out like plain packaging in Australia.14 He added that plain packaging increased the purchase of illegal and contraband cigarettes and did not have any effect on reducing tobacco smoking prevalence.
In another paper, Davidson claimed that plain packaging policies were not evidence based.15
Davidson has also alleged that the Australian Government manipulated its data on plain packaging to show that the policy measure had been successful in the country.16 According to Davidson, the observed decrease in smoking prevalence change was due to brand switching and increased excise tax, not plain packaging.
Many of Davidson’s arguments, which were echoed by the tobacco industry, have been debunked by emerging evidence of the impact of plain packaging in Australia.17
For evidence against specific arguments, visit our page on Countering Industry Arguments against Plain Packaging.
TobaccoTactics Resources
- Institute of Public Affairs
- Funding Think Tanks and Hiring Independent Experts
- Plain Packaging in Australia
- Countering Industry Arguments against Plain Packaging
- Global Tobacco and Nicotine Forum