Plain Packaging in the UK: Tobacco Industry Built Alliances
This page was last edited on at
As part of its toolbox of third-party techniques, which includes commissioning experts and funding third-party mass mobilisation campaigns, tobacco companies have built alliances more broadly with organisations with common interests. The tables presented on this page provide details of the anti-plain packaging activities of intellectual property organisations, think-tanks, general business groups and retail organisations, all of whom have financial links to tobacco companies.
In 2013 a series of Philip Morris International (PMI) private documents were leaked.1 The documents reveal the extent of a multifaceted public relations campaign against plain packaging in the UK, including a highly detailed media campaign and detailed political analysis of the best ways to prevent the implementation of the policy.
The leaked 2012 Corporate Affairs presentation revealed that PMI had mapped out the UK legislative process, including which key Government Committees and Departments would be pivotal in deciding the fate of plain packaging, noting that “Multiple Government and Stakeholder Engagement” would be required to successfully oppose the policy.
One instructive slide (Image 1) had British Prime Minister David Cameron at the centre, surrounded by his formal/informal advisers who in turn were surrounded by other “influencers”. This includes Government departments as well as key non-governmental organisations (NGOs), think-tanks, unions and business groups on both sides of the plain packaging debate.
Click on the hyperlinked organisations on this page for more detailed information on both the organisation and its activities in opposition of plain packaging.
Intellectual Property Organisations
Tobacco companies have consistently argued that plain packaging policy breaches their intellectual property rights. To this end, companies have commissioned numerous reports to support their arguments.
Organisation | Relationship with Industry | Activity |
---|---|---|
APRAM (Association des Practiciens du Droit des Marques) | PMI is a member.2 | Issued joint statements against plain packaging with sister associations European Communities Trademark Association (ECTA), Beneluxvereniging voor Merken-en Modellenrecht (BMM), the German Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (GRUR), MARQUES, and Union-IP.3456 |
Business Action to Stop Counterfeiting and Piracy (BASCAP) | British American Tobacco (BAT) disclosed it was a member in 2015.7 In 2012, BASCAP’s Director, Jeffrey Hardy, warned the UK Government against standardised packaging without supporting scientific evidence.8 BASCAP went on to submit a response to the 2012 9 and 2014 consultations, and to write to both the then Home Secretary, Teresa May MP, 10 and the Minister of State for Business and Enterprise, Michael Fallon MP, after the 2014 consultation to flag the ‘serious concern’ that plain packaging would increase counterfeit tobacco in the UK.11 BASCAP also lobbied the Enterprise Directorate-General of the European Commission in October 2014, following the UK’s notification to the EU of their proposed Tobacco Products Regulations.12 | |
European Communities Trademark Association (ECTA) | PMI declared membership in 2014. A few members are in-house lawyers for tobacco companies.13 | Issued joint statements against plain packaging with sister associations APRAM, BMM, GRUR, MARQUES, and Union-IP. |
German Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (GRUR) | PMI disclosed it was a member of GRUR in 2012.14 | Issued joint statements against plain packaging in 2012 and 2013 with sister associations ECTA, BMM, APRAM, MARQUES, and Union-IP. |
Markenverband DV | BAT, Japan Tobacco International (JTI) and the German subsidiary of PMI are members.15 | Markenverband co-organised a
Seminar on plain packaging
with BAT and PMI in 2012.16 |
MARQUES | BAT, Imperial Tobacco (IMT), and PMI are fee-paying members.17 | Issued joint statements against plain packaging with sister associations ECTA, BMM, GRUR, APRAM, and Union-IP. |
See Countering Industry Arguments Against Plain Packaging: It Breaches Intellectual Property Rights for legal opinion on tobacco companies’ intellectual property argument.
Trade, Retail and General Business
Organisation | Relationship with Industry | Activity | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anti-Counterfeiting Group (ACG) | BAT, IMT, PMI and Gallaher are members 18 | Opposed plain packaging in the UK’s 2008 consultation on the Future of Tobacco Control and both the 2012 and 2014 consultation on plain packaging (2008 and 2014 were in collaboration with the British Brands Group). Wrote directly to Government Ministers in 2013 when it thought plain packaging would be announced in the Queen’s speech.19 | |||||
Association of Convenience Stores | BAT, IMT, JTI and PMI are members. 20 | Submitted a detailed response to the 2012 and 2014 consultations.2122 It’s Director James Lowman was vocal throughout the debate with statements and arguments from him published in retail press articles. PMI’s leaked anti-plain packaging strategy identified ACS as a third-party group that it planned to utilise. | |||||
British Brands Group (BBG) | Three tobacco industry members.23 | Submitted detailed responses to the UK’s 2008 consultation on the Future of Tobacco Control and both the 2012 and 2014 consultation on plain packaging (2008 and 2014 were in collaboration with the ACG). The BBG was listed as a central “third party” that PMI wanted to use as a media messenger in its anti-plain packaging campaign. The Group was vocal in its opposition, making statements and giving interviews as well as writing briefings for Parliamentarians. | |||||
Confederation of British Industry (CBI) | BAT is a member.24 | Tobacco company internal documents show that BAT and other large business lobby organisations, including the CBI, played a leading role in promoting regulatory reform in the European Union (EU), now known as Better Regulation (BR). The CBI joined BAT in an 18-month lobbying campaign to ensure businesses were consulted in all future policy making in the EU. Better Regulation has been criticised for favouring business interests over any others, for example, health.25 In addition, prior to the final vote on plain packaging in March 2015, Director General of the CBI John Cridland urged MPs to vote against plain packaging in the UK.26 PMI’s leaked anti-plain packaging strategy identified the CBI as a third-party group that it planned to utilise. | |||||
Emergency Committee for American Trade (ECAT) | PMI is a member27 | In joint statements with other US business organisations ECAT voiced its opposition to plain packaging in 3 countries considering its implementation: Australia, the UK and New Zealand. 282930 | |||||
International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) UK | BAT is a member and a BAT executive sits on the ICC Council31 | The ICC requested a meeting with officials from the Intellectual Property Office (IPO) on plain packaging in January 2012. Emails between the IPO and ICC released under a FOI request suggest that the proposed meeting took place in February 2012.32 | |||||
Imported Tobacco Products Advisory Council (ITPAC) | BAT, Gallaher (JTI) and IMT are associate members and are also represented separately by the TMA.33 | The Secretary-General of ITPAC wrote to Treasury Minister, Sajid Javid MP, enclosing a document detailing the organisation’s concerns about plain packaging. The letter was copied to The Chancellor, George Osborne MP, and to the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Danny Alexander MP. In it, ITPAC outline key arguments against plain packaging: evidence, illicit trade, impact of downtrading, trade and competition implications, legal implications and the risks to young people of increased availability of illicit tobacco. The document also focused on the negative impacts on government revenue of the policy.34 | |||||
National Asian Business Association | Tobacco Companies are members but it is not known which ones.3536 | NABA lobbied the Treasury
advising against plain packaging.
37 The letter referred to arguments against plain packaging raised in the PMI-funded CEBR report38, and raised concerns about illicit tobacco and better regulation. The letter was copied to the Prime Minister, Secretaries of State for Health and Business, Home Secretary, Minister of State for Police and Criminal Justice, the Attorney General and the shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer. |
|||||
National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) | PMI is a member.39 | Responded to the plain packaging consultation in New Zealand 40 and Australia,41 and issued joint statements with other US business organisations against the policy in these countries and in the UK. NAM also lobbied against the EU Tobacco Products Directive Revision42 and sent a letter directly to the Irish Prime Minister to lobby against plain packaging proposals there.43 | |||||
National Foreign Trade Council (NFTC) | BAT is on the Board of Directors of the NFTC.44 | Vocal in its opposition to plain packaging in countries considering implementation. Issued joint statements with other US business organisations in Australia, the UK and New Zealand and submitted a consultation response to the UK45 and New Zealand in 2014.46 | |||||
Rural Shops Alliance | BAT and IMT are corporate partners to the RSA. 47 | RSA accepted funding from BAT to commission a report from Visuality on the likely impact of plain packaging on rural retail businesses. 48 The RSA subsequently lobbied the Department of Health over the survey’s findings. 49 In 2014, the RSA sent a letter to the Chantler Review 50 | |||||
Scottish Grocers’ Federation | BAT, IMT & PMI are members contributing 9.7% of income from memberships.51 | The Federation submitted a detailed response to the UK consultation in 2012, and again in 2014.52 PMI’s leaked anti-plain packaging strategy identified the SGF as a third-party media messenger that it planned to utilise. 53 | When the UK government announced their first plain packaging consultation in 2012, TABD issued a joint statement with other US trade associations, including USCIB, the US Chamber of Commerce, ECAT, NAM and NFTC, to oppose the proposals to express their concern about possible “curtailing IP rights and branding”.54 | Unite is the largest trade union in the UK and is “dedicated to serving the best interests of its members”55 Unite released statements in opposition of standardised packaging and submitted detailed responses to both the 2012 and 2014 consultations on the policy.56 | USCIB issued a joint statement with other US trade associations, including the TABD, the US Chamber of Commerce, ECAT, NAM and NFTC, to express their concern about possible “curtailing IP rights and branding”.57 | Issued joint statements with other US business organisations in Australia, the UK and New Zealand in opposition to plain packaging in countries considering its implementation.58 | The ASI published Plain packaging: Commercial expression, anti-smoking extremism and the risks of hyper-regulation, a book written by Christopher Snowdon. ASI submitted a response to the 201259 |
Institute of Economic Affairs | BAT, IMT, JTI and PMI all provide funding. 6061 | Until mid-2013, it was not known whether the IEA took tobacco company funding. Following a series of questions asked by Action on Smoking and Health (ASH (UK)) at BAT’s 2013 Annual General Meeting, it was revealed that the company funded the IEA. IMT, JTI and PMI subsequently made disclosures. During the debate, the IEA’s Director Mark Littlewood and its Director of Lifestyle Economics (a unit created during the plain packaging debate), Christopher Snowdon, were vehemently opposed to plain packaging and lobbied against the policy in TV, radio and press interviews, without disclosing any industry links. PMI’s leaked anti-plain packaging strategy identified the think tank as a third-party media messenger that it planned to utilise. 6263 | The MEI published a paper Plain packaging and its unintended consequences in August 2011, which cited a PMI-funded LECG report to question the quality of the evidence on the effectiveness of plain packaging. The report also argued that the policy would increase tobacco consumption and would be likely to lead to branding restrictions in other sectors.64 | ||||
Reason Foundation | Historical funding from PMI.6566 | In 2011, Tom Clougherty, then Managing Editor for Research at the Reason Foundation, who had also been an executive director of the Adam Smith Institute published a blogpiece on the Adam Smith Institute website criticising plain packaging for being a tool to stigmatise smokers.67 | |||||
Washington Legal Foundation | Historical financial links with PMI.6869 | Published “Erasing Intellectual Property: ‘Plain packaging’ for consumer products and the implications for trademark rights” written by tobacco industry consultants Patrick Basham and John Luik.70 Submitted a response to the UK 2012 consultation in opposition of plain packaging.71 |
TobaccoTactics Resources
- Plain Packaging in the UK
- Plain Packaging in the UK: Tobacco Company Opposition
- Plain Packaging in the UK: Tobacco Industry Funded Third Party Campaigns
- Plain Packaging in the UK: Tobacco Industry Funded Research, Expert Opinion and Public Relations
- Countering Industry Arguments against Plain Packaging
TCRG Research
- Standardised tobacco packaging: a health policy case study of corporate conflict expansion and adaptation, J. L. Hatchard, G. J. Fooks, A. B. Gilmore, BMJ Open, 2016;6:e012634 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012634