Australia: Smuggling and Illicit Trade Threats
This page was last edited on at
Tax Rises Lead to Smuggling?
A common tactic of the tobacco industry, in Australia and elsewhere, is to claim that tax rises, advertising bans and plain (standardised) packaging will lead to increased tobacco smuggling.
“These arguments routinely seek common ground with government concerns by exaggerating the level of illicit tobacco trade in Australia. They also distract from expert recommendations for improved enforcement to reduce illicit trade,” according to ASH Australia. 1
In its Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee submission, Imperial claimed that the new law will create a “Counterfeiters’ Charter… aiding and accelerating the spread of counterfeit tobacco products and the trade in illicit tobacco to the detriment of the Australian economy”.2
A ‘Flawed’ Analysis
A 2010 report 3 written by PriceWaterhouseCoopers as independent experts, commissioned by British American Tobacco (BAT) Australia, claimed that 12% of tobacco consumed in Australia was smuggled, costing $624 million in lost tax revenue.
ASH Australia 4 It was written by Deloitte and paid for by BAT Australia, Philip Morris and Imperial Tobacco Australia.
A BAT press release said: “A Deloitte report into illegal tobacco in Australia revealed taxpayers are losing out on almost $1.1 billion in excise revenue as the illegal tobacco market grows rapidly. The report estimated that 2.68 million kilograms of illegal tobacco products were sold in Australia during 2010, equivalent to 15.9% of the total legal tobacco market. Organised crime gangs are now the fourth largest tobacco player in Australia.” 5
Industry Claims Plain Packaging Will Lead to Smuggling
The above Deloitte report suggested that plain packaging will lead to a further increase in tobacco smuggling:
“The increase in the trade of illicit tobacco has occurred concurrently with some material changes to the regulatory and taxation regime including …The federal government intends to legislate for the introduction of plain packaging of all tobacco products during the course of 2011.”6
Just days later, BAT issued the following press release:
“British American Tobacco Australia today congratulated Customs and Border Protection on their hard work for seizing 2.5 million illegally imported counterfeit cigarettes in Brisbane. Unfortunately 2.5 million counterfeit cigarettes (equal to 2500 kg) is less than 1% of the total amount of illegal tobacco making its way into Australia each year.”7
Australia’s Home Affairs Minister Brendan O’Connor, responsible for customs, responded by accusing the powerful tobacco lobby of scaremongering to protect its commercial interests. “It is baseless to claim that one in six smokers consuming illegally imported tobacco. Big tobacco regularly quotes from reports that it commissions itself – rather than the independent research – because independent research does not back its claims,” he said.8
The companies’ campaigning websites also claim that plain packaging will increase smuggling and illicit trade by making cigarettes easier and cheaper to counterfeit.
Counter Evidence
For public health counter arguments to these industry claims see Countering Industry Arguments Against Plain Packaging: It will Lead to Increased Smuggling
Industry Threatens to Flood the Country with Cheap Cigarettes
Following the announcement in 2011 that Australia would introduce plain packaging the following year, British American Tobacco Australia said that this would lead to a “flood” of half-price cigarettes. “British American Tobacco chief executive David Crow… said cigarette prices could be slashed in half as tobacco giants try to compete with black-market imports”, according to a report in the Australian Daily Telegraph newspaper in December 2011.9
TobaccoTactics Resources
- Campaigning websites
- International lobbying
- Trademark claims
- Astroturfing
- Funding Think Tanks and Hiring Independent Experts
- Freedom of Information Requests
- Challenging Legislation
- Economic threats
- Plain Packaging
- PricewaterhouseCoopers
- Deloitte
TCRG Research
* ‘It will harm business and increase illicit trade’: an evaluation of the relevance, quality and transparency of evidence submitted by transnational tobacco companies to the UK consultation on standardised packaging 2012, K. Evans-Reeves, J. Hatchard, A. Gilmore, 2015, Tobacco Control, 24(e2), e168-e177, doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051930
* European watchdog is failing to hold tobacco industry to account over smuggling, M. McKee, A. Gilmore, 2015, British Medical Journal 351, h6973, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6973
* Illicit trade, tobacco industry-funded studies and policy influence in the EU and UK, G, Fooks, S. Peeters, K. Evans-Reeves, 2014, Tobacco Control, 23(1), 81-83, doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050788
* The transnational tobacco companies’ strategy to promote Codentify, their inadequate tracking and tracing standard, L. Joosens, A. Gilmore, 2014, Tobacco Control, 23(e1), e3-e6, doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050796
* Assessment of the European Union’s illicit trade agreements with the four major Transnational Tobacco Companies, L. Joossens, A. Gilmore, M. Stoklosa, H. Ross, 2014, Tobacco Control, online first, doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052218
* Tobacco industry manipulation of data on and press coverage of the illicit tobacco trade in the UK, A. Rowell, K. Evans-Reeves, A. Gilmore, 2014, Tobacco Control, 23(e1), e35-e43, doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051397
* Towards a greater understanding of the illicit tobacco trade in Europe: a review of the PMI funded ‘Project Star’ report, A. Gilmore, A. Rowell, S. Gallus, A. Lugo, L. Joosens, M. Sims, 2013, Tobacco Control, 23(e1), e51-e61, doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051240