Advertising Strategy
This page was last edited on at
The tobacco industry spends large sums of money on advertising, sponsorship and promotion of its products. In 2016, tobacco companies in the United States (US) spent US$9.5 billion on advertising and promotional expenses, amounting to US$26 million each day.1
WHO: It’s about Increasing Tobacco Consumption
The world’s first global public health treaty, the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC), came into force in 2005 and identified tobacco advertising as one of the factors that “have contributed to the explosive increase in tobacco use”.2 Therefore, Article 13 of the WHO FCTC urges Parties to undertake “a comprehensive ban of all tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship” to help reduce tobacco consumption. In 2008 the Conference of the Parties adopted WHO guidelines for implementation of Article 13, which outlines best practice in meeting the obligations set out in this Article.
The Link Between Advertising and Tobacco Consumption
As far back as 1992, Dr. Clive Smee, then Chief Economic Adviser to the British Department of Health, published a comprehensive study of the link between advertising and tobacco consumption. He concluded: “The balance of evidence thus supports the conclusion that advertising does have a positive effect on consumption.”3 Reviewing the impact of advertising bans that had been introduced at the time, Smee further concluded: “In each case the banning of advertising was followed by a fall in smoking on a scale which cannot be reasonably attributed to other factors.”
|
Tobacco Industry: It’s about “Building Brand Loyalty”
The tobacco industry already knew about the causal link between tobacco advertising and consumption. In 1987, for example, the tobacco industry trade journal Tobacco International ran an article on cigarette consumption in Greece, stating that “the rise in cigarette consumption is basically due to advertising”. Philip Morris responded to the article by saying that “the tobacco industry’s position in advertising is that it may influence the choice of one brand over another but has no effect on consumption …I am sure the statement in question was merely an oversight, but in the current climate of attempts to ban tobacco advertising in nearly all our major markets, it is certainly not helpful if critics can quote a tobacco industry trade journal to support their claims.”5
A decade later, Gareth Davis, then Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Imperial Tobacco, while commenting on the proposed advertising ban in the UK said:
“Obviously I am very much against anything that tries to reduce consumption of a legal product that is used by adults.”6
Publicly, the tobacco industry has long argued that tobacco advertising is aimed at building brand loyalty, and not about trying to persuade people to smoke.7 This claim has been refuted by some within the advertising industry since the 1980s.
Emerson Foote, former Chairman of the Board of advertising agency McCann-Erickson, which handled US$20 million in tobacco account sales, was quoted in 1988 as saying that: “The cigarette industry has been artfully maintaining that cigarette advertising has nothing to do with total sales. This is complete and utter nonsense. I am always amused by the suggestion that advertising, a function that has been shown to increase consumption of virtually every other product, somehow miraculously fails to work for tobacco products.”8 Foote’s disapproval of tobacco advertising and handling tobacco company accounts led him to resign as chairman of McCann-Erickson in 1964.9
David Abbott, Chairman of advertising agency Abbott Mead Vickers, (also known for refusing to advertise tobacco products10), was quoted as saying: “I think arguments like shifting brands are just insulting in their shallowness. There is no other category where you can spend between £70 million and £100 million and not have an effect in protecting or increasing the market. I think advertising has certainly slowed down the rate of decline. It has certainly helped to introduce new smokers, be they women or be they in the Third World. The other thing about cigarette advertising, I do think it makes it more difficult for health education in that it makes the Government’s attitude more ambivalent.”1112
The Marketing Dilemma: “How Do You Sell Death?”
In a British TV-documentary that aired in 1988, Fritz Gahagan, a former marketing consultant for five tobacco companies, provided insight into the dilemma faced by the tobacco companies:
“The problem is how do you sell death? How do you sell a poison that kills 350,000 people per year, a thousand people a day? You do it with the great open spaces … the mountains, the open places, the lakes coming up to the shore, They do it with healthy young people. They do it with athletes. How could a whiff of a cigarette be of any harm in a situation like that? It couldn’t be – there’s too much fresh air, too much health – too much absolute exuding of youth and vitality – that’s the way they do it”.13
Due to implementation of WHO FCTC Article 13, advertising restrictions have become more widespread across the globe. Yet the industry has adapted and become more creative in how it advertises its products.14
Types of Advertising
Sports Sponsorship
With its wide, often global, reach and appeal to young people, sport has always been key to the advertising strategies of tobacco companies.15 In the 1980s sport was used as an “avenue” for direct advertising of tobacco products.16 A tobacco industry executive was then quoted as saying:
“We’re in the cigarette business. We’re not in the sports business. We use sports as an avenue for advertising our products …We can go into an area where we’re marketing an event, measure sales during the event and measure sales after the event, and see an increase in sales.”16
Despite the introduction of the WHO FCTC in 2005, sports sponsorship has remained an effective form of indirect advertising for the tobacco industry,17 particularly in terms of increasing the uptake of smoking among young people.15
Examples of sports sponsorship:
Product Innovation
The creation of new brands and brand variants, along with packaging innovations, are an important way for tobacco companies to communicate with customers, build brand loyalty and promote their products. Innovation can be used to undermine regulation, and mislead consumers into thinking products are less harmful.
- For more information see our page on Product Innovation
Targeting Women and Girls
Women and girls are a growth market for the tobacco industry. While globally fewer women than men smoke in many countries the number of teenage girls who smoke is the same, or higher than, the number of boys.18 Consequently tobacco companies have adopted specific advertising tactics to target young women in their existing markets, and increasingly in low and middle-income countries.1920
- For more information and examples see our page on Targeting Women and Girls
Corporate Political Advertising on Plain Packaging
Tobacco companies have used advertising as a tactic to indirectly lobby the UK government against the introduction of plain packaging for tobacco products, through corporate advertisements placed in newspapers, online and even in a weekly political magazine delivered to Members of Parliament. Some of the adverts placed by Japan Tobacco International (JTI) were banned by the UK’s Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) for being misleading.
- For more details see our page on Corporate Political Advertising on Plain Packaging
Specific Advertising Campaigns
TobaccoTactics Resources
- CSR Strategy
- Motorsport Sponsorship
- Gudang Garam and sports endorsement
- A list of pages in the category Advertising Strategy